Presentation Summary
Treatment of aggressive B cell lymphoma (i.e. DLBCL) is rapidly changing.
- Historically, patients receive R-CHOP at first diagnosis, then at relapse 2nd line platinum chemotherapy (i.e. R-GDP) followed by ASCT with curative intent.
- Presentation focus on new randomized trials that may challenge current treatment paradigms.
Frontline
- POLARIX trial where R-Pola-CHP shows benefit over R-CHOP
Second line
3 CAR T trials where 2 show a benefit over platinum/transplant in 2nd line
Other
- CNS prophylaxis
- Patients with diffuse B cell may be at risk of relapse in CNS. Is it possible to further reduce risk?
- Speculation about [near] future treatment of aggressive B cell lymphomas
Panelist Discussions
Aggressive B Cell Lymphoma
Drs. Kuruvilla, Crump, and Anglin
- 2nd line therapy for patients eligible for more aggressive approaches [in Canada]
- CNS Prophylaxis – Canadian and International data
- FLAIR Study – practice changing? What is needed to make that decision?
Supplementary Content
Spotlight on CAR T
Dr. Jain’s presentation is augmented by an additional speaker/panelist segment.
Dr. Fred Locke, also from Moffitt Cancer Centre joins Drs. Kuruvilla and Anglin to consider…
- Nuances of ZUMA-7, TRANSFORM and BELINDA
- Discussion will also touch on:
- CAR T in rrMM, high risk MM, and AML
- Off the shelf allogeneic CAR T
- Importance of and what to look for in longer term follow-up
Indolent Lymphoma
(Follicular and Mantle Cell)
Dr. Martin Dreyling — Medizinische Klinik III, LMU München
Presentation Summary
Follicular lymphoma
Update to ESMO/EHA therapeutic algorithm, Dreyling, Ann Oncol 2021
First line
FOLL12 Study (Luminari, ASH 2021)
R-chemo + R maintenance vs R-Benda+ R maintenance
Relapse
First relapse
- MAGNIFY (Lansigan F, et al. ASH 2021)
3rd line
Immunotherapy (Bispecifics in combination, CAR T-cells) have a place for rrFL high risk patients
- Phase I/II GO29781 study (Morschhauser, ASH 2021)
- ZUMA-5 (Neelapu et al. ASH 2021)
- Current GLA (German Lymphoma Alliance) studies in 2022
Mantle cell lymphoma
First line: R-Chemo + R2 maintenance
Near future: R-Chemo + Ibrutinib
Post-BTK: CAR T-cells, Glofitamab, Pirtubrutinib
Panel Discussion
Drs. Dreyling, Prica, and Villa
Follicular Lymphoma
- Discussion on maintenance
- Approach[es] to early relapse FL
- R2 – Role and [potential] placement
- Discussion of the data on BiTEs and CAR T
Mantle cell
- Discussion on high-risk disease
- Younger patients – discussion on high-dose cytarabine + ICT
- Older patients and use of R2
- Discussion of the data on BiTEs and CAR T
Multiple Myeloma
Dr. Keith Stewart — Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Presentation Summary
MGUS
- No role for routine screening
Risk stratification in MM
- Chromosome 1 abnormalities important
NDMM
- Update on drug regimens that show deep response and should be considered for high risk NDMM
- Dara-Len Dex should be considered standard for non-SCT NDMM
- Len remains standard maintenance
- High risk MM remains a challenge
rrMM
- Treatment for Myeloma is being further disrupted with a number of new agents that show significant activity in heavily pre-treated
- Immunotherapies, especially CART provide durable responses
- Bispecifics are well tolerated and effective
- Venetoclax and Iberdomide are very effective
Amyloidosis
- ANDROMEDA study update
Panel Discussion
Drs. Chen, Stewart and Anglin
- MGUS screening
- Risk stratification and chromosome 1
- Transplant ineligible
- 4 drug+ induction regimens
- LEN refractory disease in 2022
- MRD directed therapy as per Masters
- CAR T and BiTEs
- VEN and t(11:14)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Dr. Charles Craddock — Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Presentation Summary
- MAG/Ven/AZA appears promising triplet both in terms of response and toxicity
- There are a number of other emerging agents where the data presented at ASH is too limited to permit even tentative conclusions
- Remember that allo-SCT is essentially the only curative option in elderly AML
- The definition of elderly AML is evolving. Is it…
- patients > 60 years?
- patients not fit for transplant?
- patients not fit for intensive chemotherapy?
- The agents emerging for management of patients not fit for intensive chemo are likely to play an increasingly important role in (A) and (B) as follows:
- Preferable option to DA induction chemotherapy in older patients with an adverse karyotype
- By improving transplant outcome – either by optimizing pre-transplant MRD status or as maintenance strategy
Panel Discussion
Drs. Richard-Carpentier and Schuh
- First Line – CPX351 and comparison to HMA+VEN
- Induction – VEN+AZA
- First remission – QuAZAR-001 (oral AZA)
- Older/unfit, high risk and rrAML – AZA+VEN+Magrolimab
- Targetable mutations – FLT3, IDH1, as well as early-stage trials on other targets
- Allogeneic Transplant
Hodgkin Lymphoma
Dr. Alison Moskowitz — Memorial Sloan Kettering
Presentation Summary
Today
- In advanced stage disease: survival benefit for BV-AVD in ECHELON-1
- In bulky disease: ABVD x6 often sufficient, RT can typically be avoided
- Relapse disease: anti-PD-1 +chemo combinations with high CR rates
Looking ahead
- High potential for anti-PD-1 blockade to be integrated into front-line
- Emerging role for CAR-T and anti-PD-1 combinations in R/R disease
Panel Discussion
Drs. Crump, Hodgson, and Kuruvilla
- How to/where to incorporate the multi-approaches to HL
- Ongoing trials for front line and high risk and potential impact
- rrHL – incorporating novel inhibitors and potential use of radiotherapy
- CCTG study – 2nd line standard vs combo Pembro+BV in transplant eligible
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Dr. Anthony Mato — Memorial Sloan Kettering
Presentation Summary
Frontline
BTK inhibitors and CIT
- Ibrutinib is more effective than CIT as frontline therapy for CLL, including those with high-risk disease (deletion 17p and unmutated IGHV)
- FCR is equally effective for mutated IGHV
- CIT (FCR) is associated with increased risk of secondary cancers
- Use of BTKi is associated with increased cardio-vascular risk over time.
- Newer and potentially safer BTKi’s are on the horizon (i.e. acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib)
BCL2 inhibitors
- Venetoclax/obinutuzumab-based fixed-duration frontline combinations can result in high rates of MRD eradication
Trials covered: Long-term results of A041202, FLAIR, SEQUOIA, GHIA, CAPTIVATE and GLOW
Relapsed/Refractory CLL – focus on BTK resistance
- About half of patients discontinue frontline or salvage Ibrut, either due to resistance or intolerance
- VEN is the most effective standard option for these patients, but remission duration is limited
- Novel inhibitors are being developed for BTK resistance
- Pirtobrutinib is a novel experimental BTKi (including in patients with C481S mutation)
- PI3K inhibitors could be used in the future to consolidate patients
Trials covered: Addition of Ublituximab and Umbralisib (U2) to Ibrut, BRUIN, MK-1026
CLL and COVID
- COVID19 booster is recommended for CLL patients treated with biological therapy
- Both anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies and BTK/BCL2 inhibitors significantly impact immune response to COVID19 vaccination
- A 3rd dose of vaccine (booster) can increase immunity in these patients
Panel Discussion
Drs. Mato, Banerji, Chen, and Anglin
- Cardiac assessment/screening and monitoring of patients on BTKi
- Upfront therapy in high-risk disease (del17p, TP53)
- VEN+OBIN
- CAPTIVATE Trial and combo therapy
- MRD negativity and testing
- Pi3K inhibitors
- COVID and boosters
Thank You To Our Sponsors!
